Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstract Fertivision 2017
Case Report
Clinical Practice Guideline
Commentary
Current Issue
Editor's view point
Editorial
Editorial View Point
Fertivision 2015 - Abstracts
Guest Editorial
IFS pages
Invited Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review Article
Original Article
Original Article | Gynaecology
Original Article| Infertility
Original Research
PCOS Guideline
Point of View
Review Article
Review Article | Infertility
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstract
Abstract Fertivision 2017
Case Report
Clinical Practice Guideline
Commentary
Current Issue
Editor's view point
Editorial
Editorial View Point
Fertivision 2015 - Abstracts
Guest Editorial
IFS pages
Invited Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review Article
Original Article
Original Article | Gynaecology
Original Article| Infertility
Original Research
PCOS Guideline
Point of View
Review Article
Review Article | Infertility
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
2025
:12;
35
doi:
10.25259/FSR_48_2025

Artificial Intelligence in Onco-Andrology: Applications in Fertility Preservation, Sperm Analysis and Post-Treatment Recovery

Department of Pharmacy Practice, P.G.P College of Pharmaceutical Science and Research Institute Affiliated With The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India
Author image

*Corresponding author: T. Sriram, Department of Pharmacy Practice, P.G.P College of Pharmaceutical Science and Research Institute Affiliated With The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India. drsriram2001@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Sriram T, Gladia Jenifer B. Artificial Intelligence in Onco-Andrology: Applications in Fertility Preservation, Sperm Analysis and Post-Treatment Recovery. Fertil Sci Res. 2025;12:35. doi: 10.25259/FSR_48_2025

Abstract

The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and onco-andrology constitutes an emerging domain with significant potential to enhance reproductive outcomes in male cancer patients. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy frequently impair male fertility. Consequently, there is a critical demand for developing effective strategies aimed at the preservation and restoration of reproductive function. AI-driven tools are being integrated into clinical practice to improve decision-making in fertility preservation, automate and enhance sperm analysis post-treatment and forecast personalised recovery trajectories. This review explores the latest applications of AI in onco-andrology, highlighting advances in machine learning algorithms for personalised fertility preservation protocols, deep learning models for automated sperm quality assessment and predictive analytics to guide post-treatment fertility restoration. By harnessing the capabilities of AI, the field of onco-andrology is poised to enhance patient counselling, optimise therapeutic approaches and markedly elevate the quality of life for cancer survivors facing fertility-related challenges.

Keywords

AI in infertility
AI in oncology
Andrology
Deep learning
Fertility preservation

INTRODUCTION

Cancer remains a significant public health burden in the United States, with projections of over two million new cases and more than 600,000 fatalities by 2025.[1] Despite advancements in diagnosis and predictive treatment, prostate and testicular cancer continue to contribute substantially to global male morbidity and mortality, highlighting their persistent public health significance.[2] Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are hallmark treatment modalities that have substantially improved survival outcomes over recent decades.[3] With increasing numbers of male cancer survivors, the need to preserve and restore fertility has emerged as a vital component of comprehensive survivorship care. This shift has given rise to the specialised field of onco-andrology, which bridges oncology and male reproductive health to address the unique fertility challenges faced by cancer patients and survivors.[4] Although conventional fertility preservation strategies are valuable, their success depends on multiple factors, including semen quality, cancer type, and treatment regimen.[5,6] These limitations highlight the need for innovative, data-driven approaches capable of providing personalised fertility care.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a revolutionary asset in medical practice and is progressively being integrated into reproductive medicine. Using advanced data-driven algorithms and representation-learning approaches, AI can analyse large, complex datasets to surface subtle patterns, anticipate clinical outcomes and strengthen evidence-based decision-making.[7] In andrology, AI enables automated analysis of sperm density, motility, and morphology with improved accuracy compared to manual methods. It has also been applied to assess sperm deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) integrity, predict infertility risk, and guide sperm selection for procedures such as Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI).[8,9] For a detailed comparison of conventional versus AI-based fertility assessment methods, see Table 1.[10,11] Despite significant advances, AI in onco-andrology remains fragmented and lacks extensive clinical validation. This review synthesises current evidence, identifies key challenges, and outlines future research directions for integrating AI into fertility care for male cancer survivors.

Table 1: The difference between conventional fertility assessment and AI-based fertility assessment.
Conventional Fertility Assessment and Sperm Analysis AI-Based Fertility Assessment and Sperm Analysis
Relies on manual microscopic examination, dependent on technician skill and experience. Uses automated image analysis and pattern recognition for consistent and rapid evaluation.
Time-consuming process requiring extensive hands-on work by trained professionals. Provides faster results through automated data processing, enabling near real-time assessments.
Subject to inter observer variability and human error, reducing reproducibility and accuracy. Delivers standardised and objective results, minimising variability and bias.
Focuses mainly on basic parameters like sperm count, motility and morphology. Integrates multiple data sources including imaging, genetics and clinical data for comprehensive evaluation.
DNA fragmentation tests may lack consistency due to manual interpretation challenges. Employs machine learning models for precise and reproducible sperm DNA quality analysis.
Limited predictive power, relying mostly on simple statistical methods. Utilises advanced predictive modelling to improve accuracy in fertility forecasting and treatment success.
Lower initial cost but requires continuous labour and expert involvement. Higher upfront investment but offers long-term cost savings via efficiency and automation.
Clinical judgment is often based on qualitative assessment and physician experience. Enhances clinical decision-making through data-driven insights and AI-supported recommendations.

AI TECHNOLOGIES IN ONCO-ANDROLOGY

AI is swiftly revolutionising onco-andrology by offering advanced solutions that tackle the intricate issues related to fertility preservation and restoration in men affected by cancer. In oncology, AI applications are extensively applied for the early detection, disease forecasting, outcome prediction and treatment planning of diverse malignancies, helping to improve patient outcomes through personalised medicine.[12,13] In the andrological domain, these technologies are increasingly employed for semen analysis, sperm DNA integrity assessment, infertility risk prediction and optimisation of assisted reproductive techniques (ART).[14] By leveraging machine learning (ML) and deep learning, AI can integrate clinical, hormonal, genetic and sperm imaging data to detect complex patterns and generate predictive models beyond the scope of traditional analysis.[15] AI-driven models demonstrate exceptional capability in analysing sperm morphology, achieving classification accuracies of up to 94% and providing consistent evaluations even under varying image qualities. AI-assisted platforms combined with sperm chromatin dispersion tests also demonstrate strong concordance with manual assessments, offering an objective and scalable strategy for DNA fragmentation analysis in sperm selection.[16,17] Deep learning algorithms further enhance the evaluation of sperm DNA integrity, enabling detection of subtle abnormalities that improve accuracy in predicting infertility risk. In a study by Ghosh Roy et al., seven ML models were compared, and an explainable random forest classifier achieved 90.47% accuracy with an AUC of 0.998 for male fertility prediction, highlighting the potential of interpretable models to provide transparent clinical insights.[18] Beyond fertility, AI tools are influencing broader aspects of male reproductive oncology. Convolutional Neural Networks have advanced the standardisation of prostate cancer grading by reducing inter-observer variability in Gleason scoring, thereby improving diagnostic consistency.[19] Furthermore, clinical decision support systems incorporating genetic algorithms and support vector machines have achieved high accuracy in predicting erectile dysfunction based on comprehensive patient datasets, aiding personalised management strategies.[20] Collectively, AI-powered solutions in onco-andrology facilitate more accurate diagnostic procedures, personalised treatment strategies and enhanced reproductive outcomes for individuals undergoing cancer therapy.

AI IN FERTILITY PRESERVATION AND AUTOMATED SPERM ANALYSIS

Fertility preservation is a critical aspect of cancer care, as chemotherapy and radiotherapy often impair gonadal function and diminish reproductive capacity. For men, sperm cryopreservation remains the foremost option, generally entailing the collection of semen samples prior to initiating cancer therapy to secure biologically viable and genetically stable sperm for potential future use.[21] ART utilising cryopreserved sperm from cancer survivors have demonstrated meaningful outcomes, with ICSI reporting the highest pregnancy (34%) and delivery rates (23%) compared with In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) and Intrauterine Insemination.[5] AI is now being integrated into fertility preservation pathways to enhance clinical decision-making and personalise treatment strategies.[22] AI-driven decision support systems assist clinicians in formulating personalised fertility preservation strategies that are tailored to the patient’s cancer type, therapeutic history and baseline reproductive profile.[3,23] Multimodal AI frameworks that combine clinical, hormonal, and imaging data further strengthen assessments, offering a comprehensive view of fertility potential that surpasses traditional single-modality analyses.[24] Alongside these technological advances, numerous studies have reported a consistent downward trend in male gamete health noted globally in recent generations, underscoring the growing focus on male reproductive health.[25] In parallel, AI-driven innovations in automated sperm analysis are redefining the accuracy and efficiency of male fertility evaluation. Conventional semen analysis, though standardised by the World Health Organisation, often shows limited predictive value for clinical outcomes.[26] To overcome these limitations, Urbano et al. developed a fully automated multi-sperm tracking system capable of simultaneously monitoring hundreds of sperm with minimal operator input, overcoming performance issues experienced in conventional computer-assisted sperm analysis systems.[27] Shahzad et al. proposed a sequential deep neural network that accurately detects sperm morphological abnormalities, including defects in the acrosome and head, achieving accuracies of up to 92% even on unstained, low-resolution images, thereby enabling rapid and clinically useful evaluations.[28] Kumar and colleagues further applied AI-based deep learning to measure DNA strand breakage in sperm cells using images from the Chromatin Integrity Test, a reliable method for assessing DNA damage, achieving accuracy above 80% and enabling consistent evaluation without the need for expensive software, thus enhancing the clinical evaluation of sperm quality.[29] Beyond ejaculate-based assessments, AI models have also been extended to testicular biopsy imaging, where deep learning and unsupervised algorithms such as K-means clustering are being utilised to identify sperm cells in patients with azoospermia and investigate the molecular underpinnings of DNA fragmentation.[30]

PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR POST-TREATMENT FERTILITY RECOVERY

Azoospermia impacts roughly 1% of the male demographic, and although treatments like gonadotropin therapy, varicocelectomy or microdissection testicular sperm extraction may enhance fertility in certain individuals, results are inconsistent due to diverse causes and insufficient evidence.[31] Meta-analytic data demonstrate that although the majority of men retain fertility following testicular cancer therapy, roughly 14% experience infertility and up to 8% present with azoospermia, emphasising the influence of both treatment modality and individual patient factors on reproductive prognosis.[32] Recent advances in AI have enabled the development of ML models capable of processing complex, multifactorial datasets to inform optimal treatment selection in ART, thereby enhancing success rates and minimising unnecessary interventions.[33] Semen cryopreservation is a feasible strategy even in pubertal boys prior to gonadotoxic therapies, underscoring its importance as a proactive measure for fertility preservation despite young age.[34] Specifically in male infertility, validated AI models such as random forest algorithms have demonstrated robust predictive power in identifying patient subgroups likely to benefit from interventions like varicocelectomy, paving the way for clinical calculators that support more personalised therapeutic decisions.[35]

To create predictive models for treatment outcomes, Bai R and colleagues applied multiple ML algorithms in a cohort of 2,625 women undergoing fresh IVF embryo transfer. The XGBoost model achieved the highest predictive accuracy for clinical pregnancy (AUC 0.999), while LightGBM performed best for live birth prediction (AUC 0.913), demonstrating the strong potential of AI-based approaches in reproductive medicine.[36] Although these findings were derived from female-focused infertility care, they provide important proof-of-concept evidence that predictive analytics can generate highly accurate and clinically relevant forecasts. Translating such methodologies to male infertility holds promise for improving individualised treatment selection, guiding fertility-preserving interventions and optimising recovery outcomes after cancer therapy. By harnessing predictive analytics, clinicians can better anticipate post-treatment fertility trajectories, minimise ineffective interventions and deliver more personalised survivorship care.[37]

ETHICAL, REGULATORY AND CLINICAL ADOPTION CHALLENGES

AI is emerging in reproductive medicine to refine sperm, oocyte, and embryo selection and to strengthen IVF prediction models. It provides new possibilities for couples facing infertility, though its use is still experimental. Ethical concerns remain, as evidence of effectiveness is limited and ensuring proper informed consent is challenging.[38] Research in reproductive medicine involving humans is especially sensitive from an ethical perspective and poses unique challenges. Initially, the intended mother is the primary participant, carrying most of the physical and psychological burden compared to her male partner. However, studies and innovations in assisted reproduction, including AI applications, ultimately extend their impact to the potential birth of offspring.[39] AI applications in human reproduction raise profound ethical concerns, given the intimate nature of reproduction and the moral significance of embryos. Addressing both general AI challenges and those unique to this sensitive context is vital to maintaining trust in ML-based embryo assessment and ART. Yet, ethical issues in this area remain underexplored. Key concerns, rooted in broader AI ethics guidelines, centre on accountability, transparency, fairness and respect for autonomy.[40] It is now widely recognised that AI systems can exhibit unintended biases, which may appear in different forms. One key concern is that ML algorithms may perform better for certain groups than others, for example, across ethnicities, often due to unequal representation of these groups in the training datasets.[41] In AI ethics and computer science research, the terms ‘transparency’, ‘interpretability’ and ‘explainability’ are often used inconsistently and at times even contradictorily. Interpretable ML models are considered safer and more effective than black-box algorithms in embryo selection, as they enable clinicians to identify confounders, detect flawed reasoning, and adjust to variations across clinical environments. Unlike opaque models, interpretable approaches allow embryologists to investigate and resolve discrepancies, incorporate patient values, and support shared decision-making. By blending ML insights with clinical expertise, responsibility for outcomes stays with the clinician, leading to more accurate, reliable and accountable embryo selection.[42]

EMERGING DIRECTIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Emerging directions in reproductive medicine highlight the integration of AI with genomics and multi-omics, the growth of digital health in survivorship care, and the application of AI to fertility restoration technologies.[43] Through multi-omics integration, AI is being used to identify diagnostic markers for polycystic ovary syndrome, endometrial receptivity, and male infertility, as well as to predict ovarian reserve, gamete quality, and IVF outcomes.[44] Although challenges remain, such as variability across datasets and limited external validation, explainable AI models are improving the transparency and scalability of these applications.[45] At the same time, digital health solutions, including web-based interventions, mobile monitoring platforms, and electronic survivorship care plans, are transforming long-term care for cancer survivors.[46] Early studies suggest they enhance symptom tracking, physical activity and psychosocial support, though more robust trials are still needed.[47] In fertility-specific contexts, digital onco-fertility platforms are improving counselling, decision-making and follow-up care.[48] Parallel advances in fertility restoration focus on bioprosthetic ovaries and 3D bioprinting technologies, which aim to restore both endocrine and reproductive function while minimising the risk of reintroducing malignant cells. Proof-of-concept studies in animal models have already shown functional restoration.[49,50] AI plays a key role in these innovations by optimising scaffold design, automating follicle assessment with advanced imaging, and supporting ovarian reserve prediction with tools.[51] Collectively, these emerging innovations demonstrate how AI is reshaping reproductive medicine by driving discovery, improving survivorship care and enabling next-generation fertility restoration.[52]

CONCLUSION

AI is transforming the field of onco-andrology through improving the precision of fertility evaluations, guiding personalised treatment strategies and predicting long-term outcomes for male cancer survivors through the integration of genomic insights and digital health technologies. Yet, the advancement of such personalised fertility care requires strong ethical frameworks, strict regulatory measures and fair access to modern diagnostics and therapies. As AI tools evolve alongside interdisciplinary collaboration, healthcare providers must ensure that innovation complements human compassion and transparent communication. Future research must move beyond proof-of-concept models toward clinically validated AI tools. Interdisciplinary collaboration between oncologists, andrologists, data scientists and ethicists will be pivotal in achieving equitable, transparent and effective AI-driven fertility care. When adopted responsibly, these technologies have the potential to improve not only clinical results but also the overall quality of life and reproductive independence of male cancer survivors.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge our family and institution for their constant encouragement and support during this work.

Author Contributions

TS: Conceptualisation, final draft preparation, editing, submission and correspondence. BGJ: Literature review and manuscript drafting.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.

REFERENCES

  1. , , , , . Cancer Statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025;75:10-45.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , . Epidemiological Characteristics of Male Reproductive Cancers in the Republic of Kazakhstan: Ten-Year Trends. Iran J Public Health. 2022;51:1807-16.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Management of Male Infertility, a Scoping Review. Curr Urol Rep. 2025;26:17.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Filling the Gaps in Oncofertility Care by Addressing Challenges Faced by Patients and Providers. Cureus. 2023;15:e50219.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Fertility Preservation in Adult Male Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hum Reprod Open. ;2024:hoae006.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Sperm Cryopreservation: Clinical and Fertility Outcomes in Male Oncological Patients with Germ Cell Tumors or Hematological Disorders. Reprod Med Biol. 2018;17:500-3.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Artificial Intelligence in Reproductive Medicine. Reproduction. 2019;158:R139-54.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Improving Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Technologies Using Artificial Intelligence for Sperm Selection. Fertil Steril. 2023;120:729-34.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , . Artificial Intelligence in Andrology: From Semen Analysis to Image Diagnostics. World J Men’s Health. 2024;42:39-61.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Revolutionizing Sperm Analysis with AI: A Review of Computer-Aided Sperm Analysis Systems. In: Computation.. Vol 13. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); .
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Manual Versus Computer-Automated Semen Analyses. Part I. Comparison of Counting Chambers. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:150-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Br J Cancer. 2022;126:4-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Personalized Medicine: Recent Progress in Cancer Therapy. Cancers. 2021;13:242.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Recent Advances in the Management of Male Infertility. Asian J Androl. 2025;27:669-72.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , . Unveiling the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Disease Diagnosis and Prediction: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches. Eur J Med Res. 2025;30:418.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , . Morphology Classification of Live Unstained Human Sperm Using Ensemble Deep Learning. Adv Intell Syst.. 2024;6:2400141.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , . Novel Sperm Chromatin Dispersion Test with Artificial Intelligence-Aided Halo Evaluation: A Comparison Study with Existing Modalities. Andrology. 2023;11:1581-92.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Unboxing Industry-Standard AI Models for Male Fertility Prediction with SHAP. Healthcare (Switzerland). 2023;11:929.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , . An Artificial Intelligence–based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7:995-1001.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , . Exceptional Electrochemical HER Performance with Enhanced Electron Transfer between Ru Nanoparticles and Single Atoms Dispersed on a Carbon Substrate. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2021;60:16044-50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Fertility Preservation for Cancer Patients: A Review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010;2010:160386.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , . Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Decision Support Algorithms, Mathematical Models, Calculators Applications in Infertility: Systematic Review and Hands-On Digital Applications. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024;2:518-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  23. . Artificial Intelligence and Male Infertility. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2025;29:200.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , . Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Sperm Videos and Participant Data for Male Fertility Prediction. Sci Rep. 2019;9:16770.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , . Evidence for Decreasing Quality of Semen During Past 50 Years. BMJ. 1992;305:609-13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  26. . Uncertainty of Measurement and Clinical Value of Semen Analysis: Has Standardisation Through Professional Guidelines Helped or Hindered Progress? Andrology. 2016;4:763-70.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . Automatic Tracking and Motility Analysis of Human Sperm in Time-Lapse Images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017;36:792-801.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , . Sperm Abnormality Detection Using Sequential Deep Neural Network. Mathematics. 2023;11:515.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , . Deep Learning-Based Robust Automated System for Predicting Human Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2023;16:16-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , . Artificial Intelligence (AI) Approaches to Male Infertility in IVF: A Mapping Review. Eur J Med Res. 2025;30:246.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , . Clinical Management of Nonobstructive Azoospermia: An Update. Int J Urol. 2024;31:17-24.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , , . Oncological Treatments Have Limited Effects on the Fertility Prognosis in Testicular Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Andrology. 2025;13:731-46.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , . The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Female Infertility Diagnosis: An Update. J Clin Med. 2025;14:3127.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , . Semen Cryopreservation in Pubertal Boys Before Gonadotoxic Treatment and the Role of Endocrinologic Evaluation in Predicting Sperm Yield. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1119-25.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , . Artificial Intelligence Based Machine Learning Models Predict Sperm Parameter Upgrading After Varicocele Repair: A Multi-Institutional Analysis. World J Men’s Health. 2022;40:618-26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , . Predictive Modeling of Pregnancy Outcomes Utilizing Multiple Machine Learning Techniques for In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025;25:316.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  37. , . The Management of Unexplained Infertility: An Evidence-Based Guideline from the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39:633-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , . Artificial Intelligence in Reproductive Medicine - An Ethical Perspective. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023;83:106-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , . Possible Reasons for Discontinuation of Therapy: An Analysis of 571071 Treatment Cycles from the German IVF Registry. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018;78:984-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , . Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Embryo Assessment: Mapping the Terrain. Hum Rep. 2025;40:179-85.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  41. , . Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown Publishers; . p. :272.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. , , , , , , . Interpretable, Not Black-Box, Artificial Intelligence Should Be Used for Embryo Selection. Hum Reprod Open. 2021;2021:hoab040.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  43. , . Multi-Omics and Machine Learning for the Prevention and Management of Female Reproductive Health. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1081667.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , , , , . AutoXAI4Omics: An Automated Explainable AI Tool for Omics and Tabular Data. Brief Bioinform. 2025;26:bbae593.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , , , , . A Scalable and Transparent Data Pipeline for AI-Enabled Health Data Ecosystems. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1393123.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , , , , . Digital Health Interventions for Adult Patients with Cancer Evaluated in Randomized Controlled Trials: Scoping Review. J Med Inter Res. 2023;25:e38333.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  47. , , . The Application of eHealth in Cancer Survivorship Care: A Review of Web-Based Dyadic Interventions for Post-Treatment Cancer Survivors and Caregivers. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022;9:100109.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  48. , , . Digital Health Interventions for Oncofertility in Female Patients: A Systematic Review. Women’s Health Nurs. 2025;31:119-29.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  49. , , . Restoring Ovarian Fertility and Hormone Function: Recent Advancements, Ongoing Efforts and Future Applications. J Endoc Soc. 2024;8:bvae073.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , , , . Construction and Bioengineering of Human Bioprosthetic Ovaries from Cryopreserved Ovarian Tissue. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26:5545.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , , , . Three-Dimensional Ultrasound-Based Online System for Automated Ovarian Follicle Measurement. EC Gynaecol. 2024;13:1-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , , . A Promising Clinical Technique to Rescue Women’s Ovarian Aging: Engineered Stem Cell-Based Therapy with the Help of AI. Protein Cell. 2025;16:233-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections