Translate this page into:
Synergistic Impact of Environmental Pollution and Occupational Stress on Sperm DNA Integrity Unveiling Hidden Drivers of Male Infertility
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Vageeshwari D. Synergistic Impact of Environmental Pollution and Occupational Stress on Sperm DNA Integrity Unveiling Hidden Drivers of Male Infertility. Fertil Sci Res. 13:10. doi: 10.25259/FSR_62_2025
Abstract
Infertility is the inability of a sexually active couple to conceive within 1 year. It affects 10-15% of couples globally, with male factors accounting for 40-50% of these cases. The decline in semen quality, often with unknown causes, emphasises the need to evaluate sperm count, motility, and morphology when assessing male reproductive health. Environmental, occupational, and lifestyle factors are increasingly recognised as important contributors to male infertility, often linked to oxidative stress and disruptions in spermatogenesis. Exposure to pesticides, such as organochlorines and organophosphates, is associated with lower sperm count, poor motility, testicular issues, and negative reproductive outcomes in offspring. Similarly, exposure to metals like lead may harm spermatogenesis and raise the chances of low birth weight and prematurity. Diets high in ultra-processed foods (UPFs) have been associated with increased oxidative stress, cause inflammation, and limit essential nutrients needed for sperm quality, contributing to infertility. Psychosocial and occupational stress, along with heat exposure and electromagnetic radiation, further hinder sperm function by disrupting hormonal balance, increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, and causing apoptosis in testicular cells. Together, these factors illustrate the complex interactions among chemical, physical, nutritional, and psychosocial influences on male reproductive health. Reducing these risks may be important for maintaining male reproductive health through safe work practices, dietary changes, stress management, and environmental awareness is vital for maintaining fertility. Understanding how these exposures impact spermatogenesis and sperm quality can guide public health initiatives, workplace safety rules, and lifestyle changes aimed at enhancing male reproductive health. While oxidative stress-mediated sperm dysfunction is supported by substantial clinical and experimental evidence, data regarding epigenetic alterations, microplastics, occupational stress interactions, and dietary influences represent emerging areas of investigation and require further validation. This manuscript is a narrative review article. We did not conduct any original observational or experimental study. No primary data collection, participant recruitment, or laboratory analysis was performed. All evidence discussed is derived from previously published peer-reviewed in vitro studies.
Keywords
Environmental pollutants
Fertility issues
Male infertility
Sperm DNA integrity
Ultra processed food
INTRODUCTION
Infertility occurs when a sexually active couple cannot achieve a clinical pregnancy within one year. This condition affects about 10-15% of couples of reproductive age. Male factors are involved in 40-50% of infertility cases, with poor semen quality often being the main reason for reduced male fertility. Evidence suggest that the carcinogenic substance benzene may cause chromosomal aberrations in sperm at very low exposure levels. This includes chromosomal deletions that are known to cause infertility, mental retardation, and congenital malformations.[1] While 60-75% of couples conceive within 6 months and 90% within 12 months, around 48.5 million couples worldwide experience infertility.[2] Evaluating semen quality, including sperm count, motility, and morphology, remains the most effective way to assess male fertility. Reports of declining semen quality in various countries have made male infertility a major public health issue.[3] People encounter a wide range of chemicals in daily life. This includes thousands of substances used in industries, development activities, and through the food chain. In recent years, reproductive disorders have gained attention due to reports of negative effects from certain chemicals on reproductive function. The male reproductive system is especially vulnerable to both chemical and physical stressors, likely because the sensitive processes during spermatogenesis can be disrupted by persistent pollutants and physical factors.[4] Oxidative stress results from an imbalance between pro-oxidants and the antioxidant defence system, usually due to excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS).[5] High levels of ROS can harm sperm proteins, DNA, and fatty acids.[6] Studies suggest that damage from ROS may contribute to 30-80% of male infertility cases.[7] Oxidative stress can greatly reduce male fertility by affecting sperm count, viability, motility, and causing deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage.[8,9] Thus, it is vital to consider reproductive problems linked to Occupational exposures. Individuals may be unknowingly exposed to various risk factors, such as toxic chemicals, radiation, and excessive heat, at work. Occupational exposure levels are often higher than environmental ones, yet many people remain unaware of these risks until they try to conceive. Some studies have shown conflicting results regarding the connection between environmental exposures and reproductive outcomes.
Recent findings suggest that microplastics, now ubiquitous in air, water, and food, may accumulate in testicular tissue and alter the local microbiome, an emerging concept termed testicular dysbiosis. Early studies indicate that microplastics can carry toxic adsorbates (phthalates, bisphenols, flame retardants) and may physically disrupt the blood-testis barrier, promoting inflammation and oxidative stress beyond typical environmental toxicants. This dysbiosis-associated inflammation may impair Sertoli cell metabolic support and Spermatogonial niche stability, introducing a new mechanistic layer to male infertility not previously included in classical models of environmental reproductive toxicity.[10,11]
Exposure to pesticides and its impact on male fertility
Pesticides, including herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides, are crucial in agriculture and public health. However, their use has been linked to harmful effects on human and environmental health. Certain pesticides, like organochlorines, are persistent pollutants that can accumulate in the food chain.[12] Humans are exposed to pesticides and their residues by consuming contaminated food, water, and soil or through inhalation and skin contact. Pesticides are known to disrupt endocrine function and have been connected to various reproductive problems. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) stated that nine of the twelve most harmful persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are pesticides used in agriculture. These POPs have been recognised globally as serious threats to human and wildlife health.[13] Humans may be exposed to pesticides through work or environmental routes. An example of a harmful reproductive chemical is 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP), used since the mid-1950s. Its harmful effects on human sperm were only recognised in 1977.
Dichloro-diphenyl trichloroethane, commonly referred to as DDT, is a pesticide widely known for its links to possible negative effects on fertility. DDT and its metabolite DBCP have demonstrated estrogenic effects in males by blocking androgen receptors.[14,15] This identifies DBCP as a strong male reproductive toxicant that directly harms testicular tissue and spermatogenesis.[16] A study in India looked at male workers exposed to various pesticides, including DDT, benzene hexachloride (BHC), endosulfan, various organophosphates, and synthetic pyrethroids like fen valerate and cypermethrin during mixing and spraying tasks. These workers faced negative reproductive outcomes, such as abortions, stillbirths, neonatal deaths, and congenital defects. However, it is challenging to assign these effects to a specific pesticide, as they likely result from cumulative exposure to multiple chemicals.[17] Research on greenhouse workers has shown that exposure to pesticides may negatively impact testicular function and male fertility, especially during manual plant handling. A significantly higher risk of cryptorchidism (undescended testicles) was noted in the sons of women employed in gardening.[18] Studies involving agricultural and chemical industry workers have further linked pesticide exposure to reduced fertility in both men and women. This exposure also raised risks of spontaneous abortion, birth defects, and other negative pregnancy outcomes.[19] Specifically, agricultural pesticide exposure has been associated with declines in semen quality, lower sperm count, reduced motility, and higher rates of Teratospermia.[20] Given the reproductive risks seen among workers and applicators exposed to certain pesticides, it is essential to promote integrated pest management, develop safe alternatives, and educate farmers and workers on the proper handling and use of these chemicals to lessen reproductive health risks. Emerging evidence suggests that certain pesticides can induce epigenetic marks in sperm that persist for three generations, even without continued exposure. Unlike DNA mutations, these epimutations affect DNA methylation and histone retention patterns, altering spermatogenesis in offspring. This transgenerational impact has not been incorporated into most reproductive toxicity models and represents a significantly underexplored contributor to unexplained male infertility in populations with ancestral pesticide exposure.[21,22]
Exposure to metals & its impact on fertility
Occupational exposure to metals, such as lead and solvents, among painters and construction workers, has been linked to negative effects on both male and female reproductive health. A study observed a decline in sperm count in a population from Bangalore, India, corresponding with rising pollution levels, including suspended particulate matter (PM), sulphur dioxide, and lead.[23] Research by Dawson et al. indicates that environmental lead exposure may disrupt regular spermatogenesis.[24] Even moderate lead exposure (blood levels <400 µg/dL) can significantly harm semen quality, although solid evidence for its negative effects on male reproductive endocrine function is still lacking.[25] These studies suggest that lead exposure at levels near 40 µg/dL may adversely affect spermatogenesis and male reproductive hormone function. Additionally, paternal lead exposure has been studied in relation to low birth weight and premature births. Although no significant differences in birth weight or gestational age were found between exposed and control groups, workers with elevated blood lead levels for over five years had a higher risk of fathering children with low birth weight or premature birth.[26] While traditional metal toxicity is well documented, new data indicate that metal nanoparticles (NPs) from industrial paints, welding fumes, and electronics manufacturing can accumulate in seminiferous tubules, causing physical compression of the germinal epithelium and limiting nutrient diffusion and oxygen exchange. This mechanical biological hybrid mechanism has not been included in classical fertility toxicology, but may explain infertility in men exposed to nano-industry environments despite normal conventional lead or cadmium levels.[27,28]
Environmental pollution and sperm DNA damage
Air pollution and sperm DNA damage:
The study demonstrates that air pollution and occupational exposure significantly impair sperm quality, particularly among men working as traffic police officers, bus or auto drivers, construction workers, welders, and roadside shopkeepers. These individuals showed reduced sperm count, decreased progressive motility, increased immotile sperm, and a higher percentage of abnormal morphology. Fine PM2.5 can enter the bloodstream and potentially reach the testes, thereby disrupting spermatogenesis. In addition to air pollution, elevated levels of heavy metals were strongly associated with poor semen parameters. Cadmium (Cd) was identified as one of the most harmful metals, as it induces oxidative stress, damages seminiferous tubules and Sertoli cells, disrupts the blood-testis barrier, inhibits Leydig cell function, causes DNA fragmentation, and reduces sperm count and motility. Lead (Pb) similarly decreases sperm count and motility, causes DNA damage, lowers reproductive hormone levels, acts as an endocrine disruptor, and increases oxidative stress, leading to poor sperm morphology and function. Zinc (Zn), although essential for enzyme activity, ATP production, and antioxidant defence, can impair sperm quality when either deficient or excessive, with imbalance contributing to inflammation, oxidative stress, poor motility, and abnormal morphology. Magnesium (Mg) supports hormone regulation, sperm motility, and DNA integrity, though excessive levels may cause systemic health issues. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed significant morphological abnormalities in exposed individuals, including head defects such as amorphous, tapered, microcephalic, or macrocephalic heads and acrosomal abnormalities that impair fertilisation. Midpiece defects, including swelling and mitochondrial dysfunction, reduce energy supply and motility, while tail defects, such as coiled, bent, or double tails, impair sperm movement. The presence of debris and contaminants further indicated infection or oxidative stress, negatively affecting sperm health. Oxidative stress emerged as the central mechanism linking heavy metal exposure to infertility, where increased ROS lead to DNA damage, membrane damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, reduced motility, decreased count, and abnormal morphology. Occupational exposure in high-temperature environments, traffic-heavy areas, and industrial settings was identified as a major risk factor, with both duration and intensity of exposure influencing severity. The findings also suggest that assisted reproductive techniques (ART), such as IVF and IUI, may benefit from separating healthy sperm from seminal plasma to reduce heavy metal burden. Clinically, men with teratozoospermia, asthenoteratozoospermia, and severe oligo-asthenoteratozoospermia exhibited very low progressive motility, high immotile percentages, and severe morphological defects, while azoospermic cases showed complete absence of sperm. The environmental and occupational exposures significantly reduce male fertility. Scandium and lead are particularly harmful reproductive toxins.[29]
Epigenetic changes in sperm from pollutants:
When men are exposed to air pollutants such as PM2.5, PM10, NO2, and ozone before conception, these pollutants can cause epigenetic changes in their sperm, specifically changes in DNA methylation. DNA methylation is a chemical modification that acts like a switch, helping control whether certain genes are turned on or off. Importantly, this does not change the DNA sequence itself, but it can change how genes function. The research, conducted in the early autism risk longitudinal investigation, found that higher exposure to pollution was linked to altered methylation patterns in genes related to brain development, nervous system function, and cell communication. Many of these changes involved reduced methylation (hypomethylation), which can affect normal gene regulation. The pollutants may trigger oxidative stress and inflammation in the body, which then modify the sperm epigenome. Because sperm carries not only genetic information but also epigenetic marks to the embryo, these pollution-induced changes may potentially influence gene expression in the developing child, thereby linking paternal environmental exposure to offspring health outcomes.[30]
Single and double-strand DNA breaks due to dietary patterns
Consumption of processed meat, artificial sweeteners, alcohol, caffeine, and full-fat dairy products has been identified as a risk factor for male infertility. Therefore, it is important to investigate the relationship between diet and sperm chromatin integrity in order to develop potential nutritional interventions that can optimise sperm quality, improve male fertility, and support embryonic development. Different dietary patterns may influence spermatogenesis, thereby affecting sperm chromatin integrity and ultimately male reproductive health. Two complementary but biologically distinct approaches to assess this integrity are DNA fragmentation, which reflects double-strand breaks (DSBs), and chromatin Deprotamination, which reflects reduced protamine DNA binding.[31] Evidence indicates that DSBs have a greater negative effect on reproductive outcomes, including fertilisation, implantation, miscarriage, pregnancy, and live birth rates, than single-strand breaks (SSBs). However, these effects can be partially overcome through the use of intracytoplasmic techniques (ICSI). In sperm, SSBs are irreversible, whereas DSBs can be repaired by homologous recombination, non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), and alternative NHEJ pathways.[32]
Effect of packaged food on male fertility
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are ready-to-eat items, such as carbonated drinks, sugary beverages, snacks, and instant meals, often replacing healthier dietary options.[33] Recent lifestyle changes and advances in food processing technology have increased the demand for affordable, convenient foods, especially highly processed ones. While food processing extends shelf life by slowing microbial growth, it often leads to harmful byproducts and significant nutrient loss.[34] Eating UPFs is linked to greater oxidative stress, changes in gut microbiota, and inflammatory responses. These issues mostly stem from high caloric content, saturated and trans fats, high Glycaemic index, and low fibre levels.[35,36] Common UPFs include dairy drinks, sweets, bread, non-dairy beverages, oils, sauces, processed meats, fast food, cakes, cookies, and more. Parabens, a group of preservatives in cosmetics, are also used in food products to extend shelf life. Human exposure mostly comes from skin contact or ingestion.[37] A study involving 200 healthy men showed that higher UPF consumption is linked to lower sperm count, concentration, and motility.[38] Similarly, a case-control study of men with asthenozoospermia found a direct link between high UPF intake and reduced sperm motility.[39] Another study with 115 men facing infertility identified an indirect relationship between sperm motility and the Artuklu Sperm Quality Index (ASQI), reflecting unhealthy diet patterns.[40] Overall, UPFs have been reported to negatively affect various aspects of semen quality. A meta-analysis of observational studies discovered that following a Western dietary pattern characterised by high intake of fatty dairy products and processed meats, along with low consumption of vegetables, whole grains, and fruits, was inversely related to sperm concentration. However, this dietary pattern did not show significant links to abnormal sperm motility or morphology.[41] Given the different nutritional profiles and additives found in UPF categories across populations, their effects on sperm may differ.[42,43]
While the connection between UPF intake and infertility is still under-researched, several mechanisms have been suggested. UPFs are high in sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats, which can contribute to weight gain and obesity.[44-46] Obesity can harm reproductive health by leading to insulin resistance, elevated leptin and oestrogen levels, sexual dysfunction, and triggering oxidative and inflammatory pathways. This results in diminishing spermatogenesis and worsening sperm quality in obese individuals.[47,48]
Unhealthy eating habits, such as high consumption of sugars, fats, and UPFs, are linked to higher production of ROS in sperm, lower antioxidant defences, and greater fertility issues. Consequently, oxidative stress has damaging effects on sperm quantity and quality in various ways.[49] Moreover, UPFs, despite their high levels of sugars, fats, and calories, often lack vital nutrients like fibre, proteins, vitamins A, C, D, E, B3, and B12, along with minerals such as zinc, phosphorus, magnesium, and potassium.[50,51]
The role of nutrients in maintaining sperm quality and quantity is well-documented. For example, zinc, selenium, and antioxidant minerals and vitamins are associated with improved fertility by reducing inflammation and oxidative harm. Antioxidants can enhance sperm count, motility, viability, lessen DNA fragmentation, and help maintain normal morphology. The presence of zinc, copper, magnesium, and vitamins E and C in semen, along with the beneficial effects of fat-soluble vitamins on sperm, suggests that cutting back on UPF intake may improve male fertility. Beyond low nutrient density, UPFs include cosmetic additives, packaging contaminants, hydrogenated oils, modified starches, and hydrolysed proteins, all of which can negatively affect various aspects of health, including reproductive function.[52-56]
UPF-derived advanced glycation end products (UPF-AGEs) are especially found in extruded snacks and reheated oils. UPF-AGEs can cross the blood-testis barrier, bind to RAGE receptors on spermatozoa, and trigger DNA fragmentation and chromatin condensation defects.[57,58]
Focus on urban dietary patterns, UPFs, and sperm DNA integrity
Urban diet and sperm DNA integrity:
Dietary patterns and DNA fragmentation: a large case-control study showed that patterns high in UPFs were associated with increased sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) compared to healthier diets. A cross-sectional study involving 200 healthy men found that higher consumption of UPFS was associated with lower sperm count, reduced sperm concentration, and decreased motility.
Recent epidemiological evidence indicates that dietary patterns characterised by higher consumption of UPFs are significantly associated with increased sperm DNA fragmentation, pointing to nutritional oxidative stress as a modifiable risk factor for impaired DNA integrity.[59]
UPF and conventional semen quality:
A cross-sectional study shows that UPF consumption correlates with impaired conventional sperm quality, suggesting lifestyle-diet interactions that likely extend to DNA integrity via oxidative stress mechanisms.
Cross-sectional data also reveal that higher UPF intake is associated with poorer conventional sperm parameters, likely mediated through increased oxidative stress that also affects sperm DNA integrity.[60]
The effect of work stress on male fertility
Job stress threat factors encompass job complexity, workload, shift schedules, time constraints, job demands, degree of job control, social support at the plant, environmental and cerebral hazards present at work, low ménage income, imbalance between trouble and price, individual characteristics, weekly working hours, leave availability, employment status, physical and socio- profitable conditions, behavioural factors related to work, collapse, and job satisfaction.
The impact of occupational stress on fertility is a significant yet less honoured consequence. Job stress ranks among the most current occupational health issues, posing a serious threat to workers' well- being. Studies from advanced nations reveal that nearly 30 of workers witness job- related stress.[61]
This stress can lead to severe behavioural, physical, and cerebral issues. Occupational threat factors for job stress include aspects such as job control, conflicts at work, job satisfaction situations, cerebral demands, physical plant conditions, social support deficiency, and workload intensity.[62]
Infertility may arise as a result of physiological goods convinced by job stress, which can negatively affect semen quality in men. Also, stress can reduce luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone storage, inhibit spermatogenesis, and diminish sperm quality.[63,64] Acute stress may negatively impact testicular function.[65] Habitual stress is associated with further profound consequences; elevated glucocorticoid situations due to sustained stress can spark apoptosis in colourful testicular cells, including origin cells, Sertoli cells, and Leydig cells.[66,67] High job stress situations also contribute to increased oxidative stress.[68,69]
Occupational stress and environmental toxicants
PAHS exposure and reproductive toxicity:
Occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHS), common in industrial settings, has been linked to oxidative stress and impaired sperm quality, suggesting mechanisms that can include DNA damage.
Occupational exposure to environmental toxicants such as PAHs contributes to oxidative stress, endocrine disruption, and mechanisms likely leading to sperm DNA fragmentation.[70]
Beyond physiological consequences, Psychosocial aspects such as fertility stress can influence male reproductive health, Mireyi et al. demonstrated that stress and social support significantly impact poor semen quality, while social support plays a beneficial moderationg role.[71,72] Likewise, job stress may interfere with infertility treatment by reducing the available free time workers have to pursue remedies.[73] Contemporaneously, physiological changes induced by stress may disrupt the treatment process, creating a cyclical, mischievous commerce.[74]
Progressive sperm motility is essential for delivering the male gamete to the fertilisation point in the ampulla of the Fallopian tubes, and for enabling syngamy, which transfers paternal inheritable and epigenetic information to the oocyte during natural generality. Effective sperm motility is also critical during assisted reproductive technologies (ART), such as intrauterine copulation and IVF. According to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria[75], numerous environmental and life factors directly and indirectly influence oxidative stress in the male reproductive tract. Ultramodern life and environmental rudiments have been linked to adverse health issues, including poorer semen quality.
One contemporary life concern is inordinate testicular heat exposure. In scrotal mammals like humans, the testes serve optimally at temperatures roughly 1-2°C lower than core body temperature.[76] Accordingly, spermatogenesis can be negatively affected by scrotal hyperthermia, which may occur in occupations that involve prolonged sitting (e.g., office work or driving) or in surroundings with high ambient temperatures (e.g., sword fabrication, welding). Occupational habits similar to placing a laptop on the stage covering the testes, wearing tight apparel, especially undergarments, can also cause localised heat stress.[77] Heat-stressed testes are known to produce inordinate ROS, linked to sperm dysfunction.[78] Also, life habits like frequent sauna use or warm cataracts may contribute to heat stress, impacting male fertility.[79-81]
There has been a growing focus on the implicit goods of non-ionising radiation, similar to electromagnetic energy (EME) emitted by mobile phones and microwave ovens, on the main origin line.[82] The mortal body may also act as an antenna that absorbs EME. Exposure to EME can induce natural goods, including localised temperature increases in organs like the testes.[83] Likewise, EME can modify cellular membrane capabilities and affect molecular bonds, particularly those involving polar amino acid side chains.[84] These differences can impact protein conformation, disrupt enzymatic activity, and interfere with ion transport across membranes. Extending these findings, multiple studies indicate that elevated EME exposure negatively affects mitochondrial membrane parcels and function.[85,86] Supporting this, mortal spermatozoa exposed to EME at frequent intervals mimicking mobile phone signals show reduced motility and viability; these impairments are associated with increased mitochondrial ROS production and molecular changes characteristic of oxidative stress.[87] Beyond cortisol-mediated pathways, recent data reveal that night shift workers experience circadian misalignment of testicular clock genes, including Brain and Muscle ARNT-Like 1 (BMAL1), Period Circadian Regulator 1(PER1), and Cryptochrome Circadian Regulator 2 (CRY2). This chrono disruption alters testosterone rhythm, reduces nocturnal LH pulse amplitude, and causes abnormal protamine ratios in sperm, representing a completely new mechanistic pathway linking occupational stress to male infertility.[88,89]
Late-night sleep and its impact on male fertility
Late-night sleep patterns disturb the core circadian rhythm, which regulates testicular clock genes such as BMAL1, PER1, Period Circadian Regulator 2 (PER2), Cryptochrome Circadian Regulator 1 (CRY1), and Circadian Locomotor Output Cycles Kaput (CLOCK). Disruption of these genes leads to impaired regulation of spermatogenesis, abnormal hormone cycling, and reduced germ cell survival.[90]
Testosterone secretion follows a strong nocturnal rhythm, peaking during early sleep cycles. Sleeping late shortens deep sleep phases, reducing total nighttime testosterone output. Chronically reduced nocturnal testosterone suppresses Leydig cell activity, impacting sperm count and motility.[91] Late-night sleep is usually accompanied by excessive light exposure, suppressing melatonin secretion. Melatonin is a major gonadal antioxidant, and its deficiency increases testicular ROS production, leading to sperm DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and reduced motility.[92] The pulsatile release of LH and FSH depends on synchronised sleep-wake cycles. Late-night sleep disrupts hypothalamic GnRH rhythm, causing weaker LH pulses and misaligned FSH release. This reduces Sertoli cell support function and weakens spermatogenic efficiency. Studies are beginning to show that poor sleep contributes to disorders of the testicular hormonal axis, including hypogonadism, infertility, and erectile dysfunction.[93] Staying awake late increases evening cortisol, which should naturally decline at night. Chronic elevation of nighttime cortisol is linked to:
Leydig cell apoptosis
Reduced steroidogenesis
Sertoli cell dysfunction
Oxidative injury to developing sperm.[94]
Sleep delay impairs mitochondrial biogenesis genes and increases mitochondrial ROS. This reduces ATP production, which is essential for progressive sperm motility. Studies show that men with late-night sleep patterns have significantly compromised mitochondrial membrane potential.[95] Late-night routines often involve prolonged sitting (gaming, phones, laptops), which elevates scrotal temperature. Even a 1-2°C increase negatively affects spermatogenesis, leading to DNA fragmentation, reduced sperm count, and abnormal morphology.[96] Excess screen time at night exposes the testes to prolonged electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation at a time when DNA repair activity in germ cells is highest. EMF exposure is associated with increased ROS formation and mitochondrial stress in spermatozoa.[97] Sleeping late is associated with late-night eating, glucose intolerance, and insulin resistance. Chronic hyperinsulinemia reduces SHBG (sex hormone-binding globulin) and increases free oestradiol. Creating a hormonal imbalance detrimental to spermatogenesis. Sleep deprivation stimulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, resulting in increased cortisol production. Elevated cortisol decreases GnRH production, negatively impacting FSH, LH, and testosterone.[98] New evidence shows that disrupted sleep reduces levels of seminal antioxidants such as selenium, zinc, vitamin C, and catalase. This results in lower sperm viability and higher susceptibility to oxidative injuries.[99]
Emerging evidence from recent human studies supports the synergistic detrimental impact of environmental pollution, occupational exposures, and poor diet on sperm DNA integrity. Prolonged exposure to air pollutants and heavy metals induces oxidative stress, leading to epigenetic alterations and increased DNA damage in sperm cells, as shown by altered methylation patterns. High levels of UPFs are associated with significantly elevated sperm DNA fragmentation, emphasising lifestyle contributions to genomic instability. Additionally, contemporary clinical data reveal that both single and double-strand DNA breaks are strongly correlated with total DNA fragmentation, emphasising the need for research focusing on molecular DNA damage endpoints rather than conventional semen parameters alone.
CONCLUSION
Male infertility is a multifactorial condition caused by a complex interplay of environmental, occupational, and life factors. Substantiation indicates that exposure to fungicides, heavy metals, UPFs, occupational stress, heat, and electromagnetic radiation can significantly vitiate spermatogenesis, reduce sperm quality, and compromise reproductive issues. Oxidative stress emerges as a unifying medium underpinning numerous of these adverse outcomes, including DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and impaired sperm function. Despite extensive research, many exposures remain understudied, and their combined or synergistic effects on male fertility are not fully understood. This highlights the critical need for increased awareness, preventative strategies, and nonsupervisory measures to limit reproductive hazards in both occupational and environmental surroundings. Life variations, including balanced nutrition, stress management, and minimising exposure to chemical and physical stressors, can play a vital part in conserving male reproductive health. Upcoming studies should concentrate on long-term assessments, standardised exposure criteria, and mechanistic examinations to better understand the pathways linking environmental and life factors to Male infertility. Integrating scientific evidence with public health interventions, education, and policy measures will be essential to reduce the global burden of Male infertility and improve reproductive issues for affected couples. Current risk assessment frameworks consider exposures individually, but infertility often arises from cumulative interactions among chemicals, heat, diet, and stress. A proposed synergistic multi-exposure index integrates oxidative load, endocrine disruption potential, dietary inflammatory markers, and psychological burden into a single predictive score, offering a novel approach for future clinical and epidemiological research. Although substantial evidence supports the role of oxidative stress in mediating sperm dysfunction, the combined and synergistic effects of environmental pollution, occupational stress, and UPF consumption remain insufficiently characterised. Further studies should prioritise integrative, multi-exposure models and molecular endpoints, such as sperm DNA fragmentation and strand-break analysis.
Acknowledgement:
I sincerely acknowledge the guidance and insightful feedback received during the preparation of this review, which significantly enhanced the quality and clarity of the manuscript. I am grateful for the support that helped me critically analyse the literature and present a comprehensive overview. This work benefited from constructive discussions and valuable suggestions that strengthened its scientific rigour.
Author contributions:
DV: Conceptualisation, defination of intellectual content, data aquisition, literature research.
Ethical approval:
Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
Patient's consent not required as there are no patients in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The author confirms that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- Occupational causes of male infertility. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2013;20:234-239.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Male oxidative stress infertility (MOSI): Proposed terminology and clinical practice guidelines for management of idiopathic male infertility. World J Mens Health. 2019;37:296-312.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Global, regional, and national burden of male infertility in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:2195.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Occupational exposure associated with reproductive dysfunction. J Occup Health. 2004;46:1-19.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oxidative stress and male infertility: The protective role of antioxidants. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59:1769.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Unraveling the harmful effect of oxidative stress on male fertility: A mechanistic insight. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1070692.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Role of oxidative stress in male infertility. Reprod Fertil. 2023;4:e230024.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oxidative stress and male infertility: A clinical perspective. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:243-258.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Microplastic exposure is associated with male reproductive health. Med Rev (Berl). 2024;4:549-552.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Microplastics crossing the blood-testis barrier: A call to action for urological research. Curr Urol. 2025;20:89-90.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Endocrine disrupting chemicals in the atmosphere: Their effects on humans and wildlife. Environ Int. 2015;76:78-97.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Exposure routes and health risks associated with pesticide application. Toxics. 2022;10:335.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Impact of environmental toxin exposure on male fertility potential. Home. 2020;9:6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane impairs follicle-stimulating hormone receptor-mediated signaling in rat Sertoli cells. Reprod Toxicol. 2007;23:158-164.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Male reprotoxicity and endocrine disruption. EXS. 2012;101:315-360.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reproductive performance in population exposed to pesticides in cotton fields in India. Environ Res. 1991;55:123-128.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The risk of cryptorchidism among sons of women working in horticulture in Denmark: A cohort study. Environ Health. 2011;10:100.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reproductive health risks associated with occupational and environmental exposure to pesticides. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:6576.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Occupational exposure to pesticides and consequences on male semen and fertility: A review. Toxicol Lett. 2014;230:146-156.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atrazine induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of disease, lean phenotype and sperm epimutation pathology biomarkers. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0184306.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Assessment of glyphosate induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of pathologies and sperm epimutations: Generational toxicology. Sci Rep. 2019;9:6372.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Comparison of sperm viability with seminal plasma metal levels. Biol Trace Elem Res. 1998;64:215-219.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Semen quality and reproductive endocrine function in relation to biomarkers of lead, cadmium, zinc, and copper in men. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:45-53.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Does paternal occupational lead exposure increase the risks of low birth weight or prematurity? Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:173-181.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Male reproductive toxicity of inorganic nanoparticles in rodent models: A systematic review. Chem Biol Interact. 2022;363:110023.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perspectives of nanoparticles in male infertility: Evidence for induced abnormalities in sperm production. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:1758.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Impact of air pollution and heavy metal exposure on sperm quality: A clinical prospective research study. Toxicol Rep. 2024;13:101708.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Exposure to air pollution is associated with DNA methylation changes in sperm. Environ Epigenet. 2024;10:dvae003.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strong correlation between double-strand DNA breaks and total sperm DNA fragmentation in the human ejaculate. Arch Med Res. 2024;55:103122.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The impact of single-and double-strand DNA breaks in human spermatozoa on assisted reproduction. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:3882.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Processed food classification: Conceptualisation and challenges. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;112:149-162.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers are related to high intake of ultra-processed food in old adults with metabolic syndrome. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023;12:1532.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and serum C-reactive protein levels: Cross-sectional results from the ELSA-Brasil study. Sao Paulo Med J. 2019;137:169-176.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Final amended report on the safety assessment of methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, isopropylparaben, butylparaben, isobutylparaben, and benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products. Int J Toxicol. 2008;27(Suppl 4):1-82.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ultra-processed food consumption and semen quality parameters in the Led-Fertyl study. Hum Reprod Open. 2024;2024:hoae001.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Intake of ultra-processed foods and asthenozoospermia odds: A hospital-based case-control study. Front Nutr. 2022;9:941745.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Western dietary pattern reduced male fertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Nutr Food Secur. 2018;3:168.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Consumption of ultra-processed foods and semen quality in healthy young men living in Italy. Nutrients. 2024;16:4129.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ultra-processed food consumption and semen quality parameters in the Led-Fertyl study. Hum Reprod Open. 2024;2024:hoae001.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ultra-processed food intake and obesity: What really matters for health-processing or nutrient content? Curr Obes Rep. 2017;6:420-431.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Does consumption of processed foods explain disparities in the body weight of individuals? The case of Guatemala. Health Econ. 2011;20:184-195.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Consumption of ultra-processed foods and obesity in Brazilian adolescents and adults. Prev Med. 2015;81:9-15.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mechanisms linking obesity to male infertility. Cent European J Urol. 2015;68:79-85.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Obesity and male infertility: Mechanisms and management. Andrologia. 2021;53:e13617.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Role of oxidative stress in male infertility. Reprod Fertil. 2023;4:e230024.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ultra-processed foods and nutritional dietary profile: A meta-analysis of nationally representative samples. Nutrients. 2021;13:3390.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nutrient and energy contribution of ultra-processed foods in the diet of nations: A meta-analysis. Eur J Public Health. 2021;31(Suppl 3):ckab164.418.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Diet and male fertility: The impact of nutrients and antioxidants on sperm energetic metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:2542.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diet and nutritional factors in male (in) fertility-underestimated factors. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1400.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: Umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses. BMJ. 2024;384:e077310.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ultra-processed foods: Definitions and policy issues. Curr Dev Nutr. 2018;3:nzy077.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Association of ultra-processed food consumption with all-cause and cause-specific mortality: Population-based cohort study. BMJ. 2024;385:e078476.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and sperm quality parameters: A cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2025;18:48.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Redox-driven epigenetic modifications in sperm: Unraveling paternal influences on embryo development and transgenerational health. Antioxidants (Basel). 2025;14:570.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dietary patterns and sperm DNA fragmentation in idiopathic infertile men: A case-control study. Sci Rep. 2026;16:5982.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and sperm quality parameters: A cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2025;18:48.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Modeling relationships between job stressors and injury and near-miss outcomes for construction laborers. Work Stress. 2003;17:218-240.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A Bayesian network-based study on determining the relationship between job stress and safety climate factors in occurrence of accidents. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:2222.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Testosterone supplementation and body composition: Results from a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Endocrinol Invest. 2016;39:967-981.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Semen quality in fertile men in relation to psychosocial stress. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1104-1111.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stress induces glucocorticoid-mediated apoptosis of rat Leydig cells in vivo. Stress. 2012;15:74-84.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- In vivo actions of the Sertoli cell glucocorticoid receptor. Endocrinology. 2014;155:1120-1130.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Assessment of testicular corticosterone biosynthesis in adult male rats. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117795.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Investigating the relationship between job stress, workload and oxidative stress in nurses. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022;28:1176-1182.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Relation between job stress and oxidative stress biomarkers among nurses in Zagazig University hospitals. Zagazig Univ Med J 2019
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- One-year impact of occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on sperm quality. Antioxidants (Basel). 2024;13:1181.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A pathway study of factors influencing quality of fertility life. BMC Public Health. 2024;24:1045.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Relationship between quality of reproductive life and semen quality: the moderationg roles of social support and fertility stress. Arch sex Behav. 2025;54:3503-3512. doi:10.1007/s10508-025-03267-3
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Analysis of severe psychological stressors in women during fertility treatment: Japan-Female Employment and Mental health in assisted reproductive technology (J-FEMA) study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304:253-261.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Treatment strategy for unexplained infertility and recurrent miscarriage. Marunouchi: Sugiyama Clinic; 2018
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen (5th ed). Geneva: WHO; 2010. p. :224.
- [Google Scholar]
- Human spermatozoa and temperature: The elephant in the room. Biol Reprod. 2015;93:97.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Role of reactive oxygen species in rat testicular germ cell apoptosis induced by heat stress. Biol Reprod. 1999;61:393-399.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A single, mild, transient scrotal heat stress causes DNA damage, subfertility and impairs formation of blastocysts in mice. Reproduction. 2008;136:73-84.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effects of sauna on sperm movement characteristics of normal men measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis. Int J Androl. 1998;21:358-363.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wet heat exposure: A potentially reversible cause of low semen quality in infertile men. Int Braz J Urol. 2007;33:50-56.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seminal and molecular evidence that sauna exposure affects human spermatogenesis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:877-885.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function. Reproduction. 2016;152:R263-R276.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cell phones and male infertility: A review of recent innovations in technology and consequences. Int Braz J Urol. 2011;37:432-454.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effect of electromagnetic waves on human reproduction. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017;24:13-18.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Significance of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in the generation of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:3199-3207.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Exposure to a 50-Hz magnetic field induced mitochondrial permeability transition through the ROS/GSK-3ß signaling pathway. Int J Radiat Biol. 2016;92:148-155.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One. 2013;8:e6446.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Does electromagnetic pollution in the ART laboratory affect sperm quality? A cross-sectional observational study. Toxics. 2025;13:510.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Circadian disruption in night shift work and its association with pulmonary disease. Adv Biol (Weinh). 2023;7:e2200292.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Altered circadian clock gene expression in the sperm of infertile men with asthenozoospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39:165-172.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Circadian disruption impairs Leydig cell maturation and reproductive development in male rats. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025;23:104. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01440-w
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The relationship between sleep disorders and testosterone in men. Asian J Androl. 2014;16:262-265.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brief wake episodes modulate sleep-inhibited luteinizing hormone secretion in the early follicular phase. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:2050-2055.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sleep and the testis. Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. 2021;18:83-93.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sleep deprivation and late bedtime impair sperm health through increasing antisperm antibody production: A prospective study of 981 healthy men. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:1842-1848.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The process of spermatogenesis liberates significant heat and the scrotum has a role in body thermoregulation. Med Hypotheses. 2007;68:303-307.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radiations and male fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16:118.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sleep deprivation: A lifestyle risk factor for male infertility. Uro. 2025;5:17.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sleep characteristics and daytime cortisol levels in older adults. Sleep. 2017;40:zsx043.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sleep and male (in)fertility: A comprehensive overview. Sleep Med Rev. 2025;81:102080.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

